Sonographic Assessment of Breast Implants Using Strain Elastography and Shear Wave Elastography in an Animal Model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for diagnosing breast implant rupture. As MRI is an expensive procedure with limited availability, the improvement of sonographic assessment is desirable. A potentially useful tool in this regard is elastography. To evaluate the diagnostic benefits of strain elastography and shear wave elastography under standardized conditions we developed an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An animal model was created by preparing an implant site in a chicken breast, imitating tissue layers covering a breast implant after mastectomy. Different broken and intact implants were inserted. Thereby, measurements were performed using strain elastography and shear wave elastography. For strain elastography, the resulting images were investigated on repeated patterns. The data generated by shear wave elastography were analyzed for significant differences between the ruptured and intact implants. RESULTS: The animal model using chicken breast generated realistic images and measurements comparable to those of a human breast. Hence, ruptured and intact implants could be compared under standardized conditions. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between intact and ruptured implants with respect to the data generated by shear wave elastography. Qualitative analysis using strain wave elastography showed different patterns between intact and ruptured implants in the animal model. Intact implants showed a characteristic sonographic image of three layers in certain levels. CONCLUSION: Shear wave elastography does not seem to produce reliable data for the evaluation of breast implants, whereas qualitative analysis using strain elastography might be a useful tool to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in oncological patients: long-term oncological outcome analysis of the treatment of subcutaneous venous access device scars in 89 breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used product, and meta-analyses showed this product to be beneficial when applied to a wound area. This study group has already demonstrated increased patient satisfaction and lower complication rates in breast cancer patients who received PRP after removal of their subcutaneous venous access device. This work is a follow-up analysis focusing on oncologic safety. Currently, there is no long-term data on the use of PRP products in cancer patients available yet. METHODS: Between the years 2012-2016, venous access device removal was supported with the application of Arthrex ACP® (Autologous Conditioned Plasma)-a PRP product to improve the wound-healing process. All surgeries were performed in the breast cancer center of the municipal hospital of Cologne, Holweide, Germany. 35 patients received an application of Arthrex ACP® after port removal compared to the control group of 54 patients. Endpoints were local recurrence-free, distant recurrence-free as well as overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45 months. No (0) adverse events were shown for cancer recurrence within the subcutaneous venous access device scar area. Thus, there seems to be no local oncogenic potential of the PRP product. All other endpoints as well as any-cause death numerically favor PRP use. CONCLUSION: PRP products such as Arthrex ACP® seem to be oncological inert when applied after removal of subcutaneous access devices. This is the first study providing long-term data about overall survival, distant recurrence-free and local recurrence-free survival after applying PRP in high-risk cancer patients.

Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor biological factors of breast cancer (BC) such as hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and grade can differ in the metastatic cascade from primary to lymph node (LN) metastasis and to distant metastatic tissue. Systematic data regarding therapeutic consequences are yet limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospectively planned, retrospective cohort study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from primary tumors (PTs), locoregional LN metastases, and disease recurrence (DR). HR and HER2 as well as tumor grade in PTs and DR were obtained by a database search. No centralized biomarker testing was performed. The impact of changes in tumor biological factors on post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: PriMet comprises 635 patients (LN tissue in 142 patients). Discrepancies for HR or HER2 status between PT and DR were observed in 18.7 and 21.6% of cases, respectively. For HR status, positivity of PT and negativity of DR was seen more often (13.2%) than vice versa (5.5%). For HER2 status, negativity of the primary and positivity of DR was seen more often (14.9%) than vice versa (6.7%). Discordance was more often observed between PT and LN metastasis compared to LN versus DR. However, numbers were small. Compared to concordant non-triple-negative (TN) disease, concordant TN disease showed significantly inferior PRS. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate receptor discordance to occur relatively frequently between PT, LN metastasis, and DR and to impact patient prognosis. However, clinical consequences of receptor discordance need to be drawn with caution considering clinical aspects as well as tumor biology.

The impact of EndoPredict ® on decision making with increasing oncological work experience: can overtreatment be avoided?

BACKGROUND: Estimating distant recurrence risk in women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer is still challenging. EndoPredict® is a gene expression-based test predicting the likelihood of recurrent disease. We analyzed the difference in oncological decision making with and without the knowledge of gene expression tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis including patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive, Her2 negative breast cancer between 2011 and 2015 at the Municipal Breast Cancer Centre Cologne, Germany. All patients received an evaluation by EndoPredict®. An oncological tumor board (TB) with knowledge of these results served as a baseline (control group). This baseline was compared to the treatment decision (adjuvant chemotherapy yes vs. no) made by oncologists with different experience levels (less than 5 years, between 5 and 15 years, and more than 15 years) who were not provided the EndoPredict® scores. All clinicians had access to clinical as well to histopathological data. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between control group and the oncologists with different experience levels concerning a chemotherapy indication. A trend could be shown in the subgroup of nodal negative patients between the treatment recommendation and physicians with more than 15 years of experience (p = 0.088). A further trend could be demonstrated in the subgroup of patients with a low Ki67 index (≤ 14%) (p = 0.063) between physician with 5-10 years of clinical experience and official treatment recommendation. CONCLUSION: It seems that inexperienced physicians may profit from the use of EndoPredict® to avoid an overtreatment. In nodal negative patients and patients with a low Ki67 index, undertreatment can be avoided with the use of EndoPredict® (borderline significance). Further prospective studies with larger study cohorts are needed to further validate this tool.

FemZone trial: a randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant letrozole and zoledronic acid with letrozole in primary breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospectively randomized phase II trial (Trial registration: EUCTR2004-004007-37-DE) was to compare the clinical response of primary breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole alone (LET) or letrozole and zoledronic acid (LET + ZOL). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either LET 2.5 mg/day (n = 79) or the combination of LET 2.5 mg/day and a total of seven infusions of ZOL 4 mg every 4 weeks (n = 89) for 6 months. Primary endpoint was clinical response rate as assessed by mammogram readings. The study was terminated prematurely due to insufficient recruitment. We report here on an exploratory analysis of this data. RESULTS: Central assessment of tumor sizes during the treatment period was available for 131 patients (66 LET, 65 LET + ZOL). Clinical responses (complete or partial) were seen in 54.5% (95% CI: 41.8-66.9) of the patients in the LET arm and 69.2% (95% CI: 56.6-80.1) of those in the LET + ZOL arm (P = 0.106). A multivariate model showed an OR of 1.72 (95% CI: 0.83-3.59) for the experimental arm. CONCLUSION: No increase in the clinical response rate was observed with the addition of ZOL to a neoadjuvant treatment regimen with LET. However a trend towards a better reponse in the LET + ZOL arm could be observed. This trend is consistent with previous studies that have investigated the addition of ZOL to chemotherapy, and it may support the evidence for a direct antitumor action of zoledronic acid.

A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable improvement in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, the optimization of efficacy and tolerability remains an important issue. Therefore, we performed a randomized, phase III non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel plus cisplatin (PT) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: A total of 798 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IV were randomly assigned to receive six courses of either PT or TC at 3-week intervals. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without progression at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, response to treatment, quality of life, and overall and progression-free survival time. Quality of life was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, version 2.0. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The proportion of patients without progression at 2 years was not statistically significantly different between the two treatment arms (40.0% for PT versus 37.5% for TC, difference = 2.5%, one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] = - infinity to 8.2%). Median progression-free survival time in the TC arm (17.2 months, 95% CI = 15.2 to 19.3 months) and the PT arm (19.1 months, 95% CI = 16.7 to 21.5 months) were also not statistically significantly different; the same was true of median overall survival time (43.3 months, 95% CI = 37.2 to 47.8 months versus 44.1 months, 95% CI = 40.2 to 49.4 months, for the TC and PT arms, respectively). The TC regimen was associated with a higher frequency of hematologic toxicity, but a lower frequency of gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicity, than the PT regimen. Mean global quality-of-life scores at the end of treatment were statistically significantly better in the TC arm than in the PT arm (65.25 versus 51.97, respectively; difference = -13.28, 95% CI = -18.88 to -7.68). CONCLUSION: The TC regimen achieved comparable efficacy to the PT regimen but was associated with better tolerability and quality of life, and should, therefore, be considered as an important alternative for standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.